front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |review |
The method of evaluation that was used was Phone and Face to Face
in Clinic. Seven children died (0.15%) at the first Phase and 3 (0.06%) of the second
phase. Most of the childrens 91% of the Phase I and 99.8%(Phase
II) were re-evaluated at the follow-up after 3 months. The vast majority 99% and
99.6% had scores of 5, i.e., good recovery. Each center participating demonstrated the same tendency for the vast majority of children to get good recovery ratings at the local follow-up assessment. |