|
|
|
front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |review |
 |
Variation of
urinary arsenic in samples of the study populatioon by distance to the power plant: higher
levels in the vicinity of the power plant indicate that even under the low exposure levels
of the 1990ies there is still an impact of the environmental exposure to arsenic on the
body burden. Also occupational exposure may contribute to the elevated levels in urine in the vicinity of the plant. What may justify the conclusion that there is likely also an environmental impact? |