|
|
Biography |
|
|
Eduardo J. Trigo, holds a Ph.D. in Ag. Economics from the University of Wisconsin and serves as Scientific Adviser to the International Relations Directorate of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation of Argentina and as member of the Academic Council of the Graduate School of the Faculty of Agronomy of the University of Buenos Aires. He also is Director of Grupo CEO, a consulting firm specializing in the agricultural economics and policy fields. In the past has served at the Board of Directors of the National Agency for the Promotion of Science and Technology and in the Biotechnology Policy Advisory Committee at the Secretariat for Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Food. Before that he was Executive Director of the Fundación AgenINTA in Argentina, Director of the Technology Generation and Transfer Program of the Interamerican Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture, IICA, in San Jose Costa Rica, and Director of Research at the International Service for National Agricultural Research, ISNAR, in The Hague, Holland. His professional experience includes work as a consultant to several Latin-American and The Caribbean national governments and to international organizations, including, among others, the OECD, IDB, EU, FAO the Stockholm Environmental Institute and FAO. His main area of work is science and technology policy and organization, with emphasis in the agricultural, food and biotechnology sector, where he has published extensively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soybeans in Argentina: Benefits and Lessons for the Future
The Argentinean case is a clear example of how societies can benefit from agricultural biotechnologies. GM crops (herbicide-tolerant soybeans) were introduced in 1996, and since nine additional events have been released commercially. At the present, GM varieties represented over 99% of planted soybeans, 75% of maize and 80% for cotton. Along this process, Argentina has become the second largest producer of GM crops, with over 19.5 million hectares planted. Overall this process has resulted in more than doubling of grain and oilseed production and significant economic benefits, estimated to be more than 20 billion USD for the 10 years past since their introduction (19.7 billion originated in soybeans, about 500 million form maize and about 20 million from insect-resistant cotton, with most of the benefits going to farmers). The presentation analyzes the main aspects of this process as well as its implications for natural resources use and other indirect effects on the wider economy, including nutrient extraction and potential future productivity losses, economic growth and employment creation, among other aspects. Out of these experiences several important issues come as lessons for the future. Emphasis is made on the benefits of the early adopter. It is clear that those countries that came early on into the technologies benefited the most, and that this behavior even contributed to global benefits. Related to this aspect is the importance of the institutional framework – biosafety regulations and a seed industry - to be able to benefit from the technologies. Finally, other policies implications covering biosafety / trade / infrastructure considerations are also touché upon as critical components for assuring the full exploitation of thetechnologies’ potential benefits.
|
|
|
|
|