front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |review |
Circling back to the discussion of abdominal
adiposity, data regarding waist circumference and diabetes illustrate its
health impact. These are age-adjusted data from the Nurses’ Health Study,
analyzing responses from 43,581 subjects who provided information on weight
and body measurements in 1986. These subjects had no history of cancer,
heart disease, stroke, or any type of diabetes. An 8-year follow-up in this
population showed a strong positive association between waist circumference
and the incidence of diabetes. At the far end of the spectrum, women with a
waist circumference >38 inches had a diabetes risk of 22.4, relative to
women in the normal waist circumference range of <28 inches. Other obesity
measures studied included body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio; both of
these were also found to be independent determinants of type 2 diabetes in
this population. The sharpest risk gradient was documented with waist
circumference, indicating that it is a powerful independent predictor of
type 2 diabetes in women. (WC was measured at the high point of the iliac crest at minimal respiration to the nearest 0.1 cm.) Carey VJ, Walters EE, Colditz GA, et al. Body fat distribution and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women: the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:614-619. |