front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |43 |44 |45 |46 |47 |48 |49 |50 |51| 52 |53 |54 |55 |56 |57 |58 |review |
Second, one must understand
the process of human injury in earthquake-induced building
failure. Third, one must
develop the analytical framework for the analysis of injury patterns
and for the analysis of the relationship between specific causative
agents and negative consequences (129).
Furthermore, the causal
mechanisms and nature of earthquake-related injuries are
difficult to determine precisely, as are the appropriate variables
and indicators describing such injuries.
One must consider hazard exposure; construction types and
their performance during earthquakes; the influence of nonstructural
components, building components, and building contents; building
occupancy and the behavior of occupants; emergency and rescue
response; and medical treatment provided.
Not surprisingly, one is soon faced with the problem that
such information is very difficult to collect because it must be
collected immediately after the impact when conditions are most
chaotic and all qualified personnel are directed to the primary
life-saving effort (132).
This use of personnel is, in most cases, justifiable;
however, without the active assistance of search and rescue
personnel, "backtracking" injuries from hospitals to specific
building-collapse sites may be impossible.
|