prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |review
Letters to the editor/ rapid responses:

Publishing 30% of what we received and those 6-7 months late.

How bad is that?

70%; speed -

post-publication peer review

(harder work is done after publication than before)

EXPLOITING Interactivity, infinite space and instantaneity

minimalist interference

everything

no right of author to screen (they get email alerts)

as high a standard as the letters - no

bores - yes, who hog the microphone

interactive - 20 000 conversations

disenfranchised