front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |review

In the epidemiologic sense, is 'attributable fraction' the most sensible choice in assessing liability (probability of causation)? In the legal arena we ask, Did the exposure "more likely than not" cause the plaintiff's disease? Perhaps the more appropriate question is, To what extent did the exposure impact disease progression?