front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |review |
This is an example
of output. The following is a different example, a shorter one. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii: an unexpected difference in epidemiologic behavior Author: Bernards AT, Frenay HM, Lim BT, Hendriks WD, Dijkshoorn L, van Boven CP. Journal: Am-J-Infect-Control. 1998 Dec; 26(6): 544-51 Year published: 1998 Pathogen: Acinetobacter baumannii, MRSA, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusDuration: Dates of investigation: A) Dec. 1994; B) Jul 1995; C) Jul 1995 Country: Netherlands No. of beds: A) 424; B) 380; C) 848 Hospital: A) community teaching hospital; B) community hospital; C) regional referral center, university hospital Mode of Transmission: airborne?; contaminated, environment is a possibility Infection sites: bacteremia, BSI, pneumonia Attack Rate: A) 22; B) 6; C) 1 No. deaths: A) 1 Methods: 1) laboratory studies (sedimentation plates, PCR fingerprinting); 2) evaluation of control measures (private rooms with anteroom in all three hosp, contact isolation in A, strict isolation in B and C, negative air pressure in C) Results: 1) 3 index cases were transferred from Greece or Spain; 2) isolation of A baumannii on sedimentation plates; 3) lack of evidence of human carriage; 3) no spread occurred in hospital C, the only hospital with negative air pressure in the patient's anteroom; considering all 3 factors, airborne transmission is most likely ; 5) notes: in hospital C, infected patient underwent skin disinfection through daily washing with povidone-iodine solution for MRSA carriage Discussions: Contamination of the environment remains a possibility, especially in hospital A where a significant lag time of 3 weeks occurred between the index case and the next cases; 2) no environmental cultures |