front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |review |
PROS of the
questionnaire/survey include their nonreactiveness. The individual’s
behavior will usually not change as a direct result of the assessment
technique. Also, questionnaires/surveys are practical because they
are low in cost and relatively convenient to the participant. Another
benefit of the questionnaire/survey is it’s applicability and ability
to be modified to suit the population of interest. Finally,
questionnaires/surveys have acceptable accuracy (both reliability and
validity) in situations where the investigator is trying to measure
differences in physical activity levels between groups.
CONS. Physical activity levels obtained from questionnaires do not reflect total energy expenditure for a particular individual because they do not consider the energy requirements of such things as basal metabolic rate, thermic effect of food, and in most cases, activities of daily living (lower intensity activities). There may be assessment issues surrounding an individual’s inability to accurately recall activity. Different populations may interpret physical activity in different ways or participate in different types of activities; therefore, the subjective measure should be modifiable to fit the needs and interests of the population. Recommended Readings: Kriska AM and Caspersen CJ (1997). Introduction to the Collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires in A Collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires for Health-Related Research. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 29 [Supplement]. Welk GJ (2002). Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. |