front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |review |
LEGEND
Green
= Pass
Pink = Drop course, Absent, Exempt, Incomplete Grey = In Grade 11 (S3) or lower
Red = Fail
Purple = In Grade 12 (S4) but no LA Test Mark Black = Withdrawn
How much do educational outcomes differ across socioeconomic
levels? We compared
performance on the
Grade 12 language arts standards tests by Winnipeg socioeconomic
area. The graph on the left reflects what the schools see when they
review the performance of students taking the tests: 92 % of
students living in the high-SES areas passed, along with 75 % of
those living in low SES areas.
These numbers do not tell the whole story, however; they just
report results for those who are in school that day, in Grade 12 and
writing the standards test.
The larger question is: What happens when we focus on who
should have been writing the standards test at that time?
The second graph on the right tells a very different story.
To develop this graph we used a cohort of children born in
Manitoba in 1984 who remained in Manitoba until 2001-02.
We determined where they were in the school system at that
time (that is during what should have been their final year in
school) identifying those who were in school but had not made it to
Grade 12 yet, and those who were in Grade 12 but for a variety of
reasons (absence, dropped course etc.)
did not take the test. We also identified those who had
withdrawn from school (not attended for two years). This showed a
very different reality: only 27 % of youth living in low-SES areas
who should have been writing the test that year actually wrote and
passed the test. The on-time
pass rate was over two-and-a-half times higher for students in the
high-SES group (77 %).
|