front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |43 |44 |45 |46 |47 |48 |49 |review |
The above slide summarizes the calculated
percentage changes from baseline in insulin resistance at the conclusion of
three 16-week, double-blind studies, using homeostasis model assessment
(HOMA). The HOMA models followed standardized mathematical calculations designed to estimate beta-cell function and insulin resistance values. For an individual patient, a decrease in values for insulin resistance and an increase in values for beta-cell function indicate a positive effect on these parameters. HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µlU/mL) x fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) 22.5 Compared with baseline, insulin resistance significantly decreased in the pioglitazone 30 mg, the sulfonylurea + pioglitazone 30 mg, and the metformin + pioglitazone 30 mg treatment groups by 12.5% (P=0.045), 30.1% (P<0.001), and 18.2% (P=0.039), respectively. In the placebo, the sulfonylurea + placebo, and the metformin + placebo treatment groups, insulin resistance increased 30.3% (P=0.002), 20.1% (P=0.001) and 17.6% (P=0.100), respectively, compared with baseline. Rosenstock J, for the Pioglitazone HCl Study Group. Diabetologia. 2000;43(suppl 1): A192. Matthews DR, et al. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412-419. |