front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |review |
II. Global Health
Disparities: Are Profound Health Inequalities Fair?
Perhaps it does not, or
should not, matter if global health serves the interests of the
richest countries. After all, there are powerful humanitarian
reasons to help the world’s least healthy people. But even ethical
arguments have failed to capture the full attention of political
leaders and the public.
It is well known that the
poor suffer, and suffer more than the rich. Unfortunately, this is
also true with respect to global health. What is less often known is
the degree to which the poor suffer unnecessarily. The global burden
of disease is not just shouldered by the poor, but
disproportionately so, such that health disparities across
continents render a person’s likelihood of survival drastically
different based on where she is born. These inequalities have become
so extreme and the resultant effects on the poor so dire, that
health disparities have become an issue no less important than
global warming or the other defining problems of our time.
The current global
distribution of disease has led to radically different health
outcomes in developed and developing countries. Disparities in life
expectancy among rich and poor countries are vast. Average life
expectancy in Africa is nearly 30 years less than in the Americas or
Europe. Life expectancy in Zimbabwe or Swaziland is less than half
that in Japan; a child in born in Angola is 73 times more likely to
die in the first few years of life than a child born in Norway; and
a women giving birth in sub-Saharan Africa is 100 times more likely
to die in labor than a women in an rich country. While life
expectancy in the developed world increased throughout the twentieth
century, it actually decreased in the least developed countries and
in transitional States such as Russia. As little as one concrete
example offers a sense of perspective on the global health gap. In
one year alone, 14 million of the poorest people in the world died,
while only four million would have died if this population had the
same death rate as the global rich.
|