front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |review |
This graph presents
the average number of years of life that could be expected at birth for men living in the
UK for the years 1871 through to 1961. The solid blue line is plotted from the observed
data, the yellow line represents a projection of the existing trend from 1871 up to 1941
extrapolated to 1961. What do you notice about the trend? What reasons would you give to explain it? Here’s a test of world history. What happened in Western Europe, particularly the UK around the time of the Second World War (1939-45) that might have lead to a flattening of the increase in expected years of life at birth? The graph appears to show that since 1871, life expectancy at birth increased from about 41 years to about 67 years by 1970. If this represented actual gain in life expectancy, it would indicate tremendous health gain. But that is not the correct interpretation, although you will hear it said (often by people in the pharmaceutical and medical technology industries) that life expectancy has increased from 40 years to 70 years in the past 100 years thanks to modern medicine and drugs. Why is this graph misleading? What is the correct interpretation? |