front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |43 |44 |45 |46 |47 |48 |review |
This slide
describes the change in total diabetes prevalence.
In 1976-1980
the prevalence was 5.03%.
In 1999-2004,
the prevalence is 8.8.
In 1988-1994 it
was roughly half way in between or 7.02%, but I am not showing that on
this slide.
Now, when we
partition the prevalent diabetes cases in to their respective BMI
categories, we see that of the 5 cases, there were about 1.6 cases who
were lean, 1.5 …….etc.
When we do the
same in 1999-2004, se see that there was a slight decline in the % who
werein the normal/underwight group, an increase of 1 prevalent case per
100 populatoin who was diabetic and overweiht, an increase of 1.2 who
were obese.
What we are
doing in this analysis is simply taking the excess cases from each
group, and examining the BMI contribution of those groups.
|