front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |review |
B. National Economic
Interests: Trade and Commerce
Even the most powerful
countries have a narrow interest in preventing the migration of
large-scale health threats to their shores. But beyond narrow
self-interest, are there broader, “enlightened” interests in
redressing extremely high rates of disease and premature death in
the world’s poorest regions? There is a strong case that a
forward-looking foreign policy would seek to reduce enduring,
intractable diseases in developing countries.
Epidemic disease dampens
tourism, trade, and commerce, as the 2003 SARS outbreaks
demonstrated. Animal diseases such as FMD, BSE, and avian influenza
similarly had severe economic repercussions on trade and commerce,
with mass cullings of flocks and herds, and provoked trade bans on
beef, lamb, or poultry. Massive economic disruption would ensue from
a pandemic of human influenza, with a projected loss of up to 6% in
global GDP.
In regions with extremely
poor health, economic decline is almost inevitable. HIV/AIDS in
sub-Saharan Africa accounts for 72% of global AIDS deaths. Average
life expectancy in this region is now 47 years, when it would have
been 62 without AIDS. For some of the worst affected countries such
as Botswana, life expectancy has declined from 75.7 to 34.2 years of
age. Most of the excess mortality is among young adults aged 15-49,
leaving the country without entrepreneurs, a skilled workforce,
parents, and political leaders. The World Bank estimates that AIDS
has reduced GDP nearly 20% in the hardest-hit countries. AIDS, of
course, is only one disease in countries experiencing multiple
epidemics, starvation and massive poverty, and regional conflicts
that devastate the population.
Countries with extremely
poor health become unreliable trading partners without the capacity
to develop and export products and natural resources; pay for
essential vaccines and medicines; repay debt; and require increased
financial aid and humanitarian assistance. In short, a foreign
policy that seeks to ameliorate health threats in poor countries can
benefit the public and private sectors in developed, as well as
developing, countries.
|