front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |review |
B. Who Has the
Responsibility to Ameliorate the Vast Disparities in Global Health?
A core insight about
health disparities is that there are multiple causal pathways to
numerous dimensions of disadvantage. The causal pathways to
disadvantage include poverty, poor education, unhygienic and
polluted environments, and social disintegration. These, and many
other causal agents, lead to systematic disadvantage not only in
health, but also in nearly every aspect of social, economic, and
political life. Inequalities of one kind beget other inequalities,
and existing inequalities compound, sustain, and reproduce a
multitude of deprivations in well-being.
Human instinct tells us
that it is unjust for large populations to have such poor prospects
for good health and long life simply by happenstance of where they
live. Although almost everyone believes it is unfair that the poor
live miserable and short lives, there is little consensus about
whether there is an ethical, let alone legal, obligation to help the
downtrodden. When are health inequalities between different
societies unjust, and what do wealthier societies owe as a matter of
justice to the
poor in other parts of the world? Even if reasonable people believed
that health disparities were morally wrong, they would be hard
pressed to answer the difficult questions: Why are
inequalities unfair? Who is responsible for ameliorating the
high rates of illness and death? And what level of assistance
is ethically warranted?
|